维基百科忒修斯之船条目完美呼应哲学悖论

这是Twitter（X）平台上的一则讨论串，用户@depthsofwiki指出维基百科「忒修斯之船」条目自2003年7月创建以来已被编辑1792次，原始内容的留存率为0%，并附上了条目最初的内容和历史版本链接。后续网友的评论巧妙地呼应了「忒修斯之船」的哲学悖论：尽管条目内容完全更换，但它依然是同一篇维基百科条目，就像所有部件都被更换后，忒修斯之船是否还是同一艘船的讨论。
- 梗点：用维基百科条目的真实编辑历史，完美对应了「忒修斯之船」的哲学命题，形成了极具趣味的现实呼应。

生成梗图

@@nya_marisa Twitter(X)

这证明了（忒修斯之船）确实是“同一艘船”，因为这的确是同一个URL地址上的同一篇维基百科条目，和最初创立者们创立的意图也一致。

对白

@depthsofwiki

The "Ship of Theseus" article has been edited 1792 times since it was created in July of 2003. At present, 0% of the phrases in the original article (seen below) remain. 「忒修斯之船（Ship of Theseus）」条目，自条目在2003年7月创立以来，已经被编辑1792次。如今，最初那篇文章中的句子保留到了现在的部分是0%。(见下图)

@depthsofwiki

link to the OG article from 2003! I got the 0% figure from the "Who Wrote That?" tool, which shows what parts of articles came from which contributors. It rocks and you should download it! en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?ti... 2003年最初条目的链接！句子中留到现在的部分是0%这个数字我是从“谁写了这一段？”工具中获得的，这个工具能显示条目中的每一段分别来自哪位贡献者。它很赞，你也该下载它！

@spikesguides

And yet it is the same article! 可是它还是同一篇条目！

@nya_marisa

This proves that it is indeed the "same ship", in the sense that this is indeed the same wikipedia article on the same URL built for the same purpose by its first users. 这证明了（忒修斯之船）确实是“同一艘船”，因为这的确是同一个URL地址上的同一篇维基百科条目，和最初创立者们创立的意图也一致。

@mad_max_997

Article of Theseus 是忒修斯之条目呢

文本内容

Ship of Theseus
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
According to an ancient Greek legend, Theseus had a warship that was preserved as a historical relic by the Athenians. Some of its boards rotted and had to be replaced. After many, many years, many such replacements occurred. Eventually, none of the original boards were present. Philosophers could then debate whether it was the same ship that Theseus had used, and if not, when it had ceased to be so.
A modern embellishment
If Theseus paid a nontransferable fee, allowed to be used for only one ship, for the privilege of docking in a particular harbor, would he violate the non-transferability of his license if repeated replacement of boards eventually had the result described above?

整体描述

这是Twitter（X）平台上的一则讨论串，用户@depthsofwiki指出维基百科「忒修斯之船」条目自2003年7月创建以来已被编辑1792次，原始内容的留存率为0%，并附上了条目最初的内容和历史版本链接。后续网友的评论巧妙地呼应了「忒修斯之船」的哲学悖论：尽管条目内容完全更换，但它依然是同一篇维基百科条目，就像所有部件都被更换后，忒修斯之船是否还是同一艘船的讨论。
- 梗点：用维基百科条目的真实编辑历史，完美对应了「忒修斯之船」的哲学命题，形成了极具趣味的现实呼应。